Jan
7
Submitted by admin on January 7, 2009 - 12:04pm

What price did Britney pay for her comback? Voluntarily giving up the fight to regain custody of her boys in exchange for fame? According to OK Magazine's cover, it was just that.
Last fall, as her upcoming concert tour was being organized, Brit's camp discovered that because of the star's history, they could not purchase insurance to cover her tour unless she was still under the conservatorship of her father Jamie Spears. Until that point, the plan was for the conservatorship to be lifted on Dec. 31, followed by Britney, 27, heading to family court with a petition to regain custody of Preston and Jayden.
And so, on Oct. 28, the singer agreed to indefinitely accept her father as her conservator – a decision which meant she would still legally be considered a child. No judge would give her custody of her kids, nor would her ex-husband, Kevin Federline, agree to it.
"Whether it was her decision or whether she was pressured into it, Britney's deal with the devil put the tour ahead of the kids," the insider tells OK!.
So basically, by accepting her father as her conservator, she has labeled herself a child, therefore not labeling herself a mother. Britney has made some stupid decisions in her life but this one might take the cake.
Source
FILED UNDER:
SIMILAR STORIES:
Comments
Bricks and Stones Gossip Groups
Click here to view our growing list of Gossip Groups!





I don't really think this is the entire story. I believe it would be a lot more plausible that she gave up her kids for her tour SO THAT she could show the world that she's getting her life back in order and would be able to handle having the kids without losing it again.
Post new comment
More information about formatting options
Please share your opinion, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.
Community Rules: